MerLean-example

34 Lem 7: Space-Time Decoupling

Definition 930 The Deformed Code

The deformed stabilizer code at the gauging time \(t_i\), constructed from the fault-tolerant gauging procedure’s data. Given a procedure \(\mathrm{proc}\), the deformed code is defined as the deformed stabilizer code built from the procedure’s deformed data and cycle parity, using the commutativity of the original checks.

Definition 931 Full Outcome Preserving

The full outcome-preserving predicate for the fault-tolerant gauging procedure. A spacetime fault \(F\) preserves the outcome if both:

  1. The gauging sign \(\sigma \) is preserved (no time-logical effect), i.e., \(\operatorname {PreservesGaugingSign}(\mathrm{proc}, F)\), AND

  2. The net Pauli error at \(t_i\) is in the deformed stabilizer group (no space-logical effect), i.e., \(F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(\mathrm{proc}.\mathrm{phase2Start}) \in \mathcal{S}(\text{deformedCode})\).

This captures the paper’s Def 11: a spacetime stabilizer leaves both the classical measurement record and the quantum code state unchanged.

Definition 932 Full Gauging Logical Fault

A spacetime logical fault under the full outcome predicate: the fault is syndrome-free and changes the outcome (either flips the gauging sign or applies a nontrivial logical operator to the code state). Formally, \(\operatorname {IsFullGaugingLogicalFault}(\mathrm{proc}, F) := \operatorname {IsGaugingLogicalFault}(\mathrm{proc}, \mathrm{proc}.\mathrm{detectorOfIndex}, \operatorname {FullOutcomePreserving}(\mathrm{proc}), F)\).

Definition 933 Full Gauging Stabilizer

A spacetime stabilizer under the full outcome predicate: the fault is syndrome-free and preserves both the gauging sign and the code state. Formally, \(\operatorname {IsFullGaugingStabilizer}(\mathrm{proc}, F) := \operatorname {IsGaugingStabilizer}(\mathrm{proc}, \mathrm{proc}.\mathrm{detectorOfIndex}, \operatorname {FullOutcomePreserving}(\mathrm{proc}), F)\).

A logical fault changes the outcome: \(\neg (\text{sign preserved} \land \text{Pauli} \in \mathcal{S})\). Equivalently: either the sign is flipped, or the Pauli error is a nontrivial logical. Formally, if \(F\) is a full gauging logical fault, then

\[ \operatorname {FlipsGaugingSign}(\mathrm{proc}, F) \; \lor \; F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \notin \mathcal{S}(\text{deformedCode}). \]
Proof

From the logical fault hypothesis \(\mathrm{hlog}\), we extract \(\mathrm{hnotpres} := \mathrm{hlog}.2\), which states that the full outcome is not preserved. Unfolding the definition of \(\operatorname {FullOutcomePreserving}\) and pushing the negation inward, we obtain that either the sign is not preserved or the Pauli error is not in the stabilizer group. By the dichotomy \(\operatorname {flipsOrPreserves}(\mathrm{proc}, F)\), the fault either flips or preserves the gauging sign. In the first case, we conclude \(\operatorname {FlipsGaugingSign}(\mathrm{proc}, F)\) directly. In the second case, since the sign is preserved, the negated conjunction forces \(F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \notin \mathcal{S}\).

Definition 935 Space Logical Fault

A space-only logical fault: a spacetime fault \(F\) such that

  1. \(F\) is pure-space (no time-faults),

  2. all space-faults are concentrated at time \(t_i\): for all \(t \neq \mathrm{proc}.\mathrm{phase2Start}\), \(F.\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = \emptyset \),

  3. the composite Pauli error at \(t_i\) is a nontrivial logical of the deformed code: \(\operatorname {isLogicalOp}(\text{deformedCode}, F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i))\).

Definition 936 Time Logical Fault

A time-only logical fault: a spacetime fault \(F\) such that

  1. \(F\) is pure-time (no space-faults),

  2. \(F\) is syndrome-free in the gauging procedure,

  3. \(F\) flips the gauging sign \(\sigma \).

Theorem 937 \(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-Additivity of gaussSignFlip Under Composition

The \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}\) is \(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-additive under composition:

\[ \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_1 \cdot F_2) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_1) + \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_2) \]

in \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\). This follows from the fact that the time-faults of the composition are the symmetric difference, and the indicator function is additive over \(\mathbb {Z}_2\).

Proof

Expanding the definition of \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}\) and of \(\operatorname {compose}\) (which takes the symmetric difference of time-faults), we rewrite the sum using \(\sum \)-distributivity over addition. For each vertex \(v\), we apply the \(\mathbb {Z}_2\) indicator additivity lemma for symmetric differences, which states that \(\sum _{b \in S \mathbin {\triangle } T} \mathbf{1}[g(b)] = \sum _{b \in S} \mathbf{1}[g(b)] + \sum _{b \in T} \mathbf{1}[g(b)]\) in \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\). This gives the result by congruence.

Theorem 938 Multiplicativity of Pauli Error Under Composition

The net Pauli error at time \(t\) is multiplicative under composition:

\[ (F_1 \cdot F_2).\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t) = F_1.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t) \cdot F_2.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t). \]

This follows because the space-faults of the composition are the symmetric difference, the filter distributes over symmetric difference, and \(\mathbb {Z}_2\) sums are additive (corresponding to the Pauli product).

Proof

By extensionality, we verify both the \(x\)-vector and \(z\)-vector components separately. For the \(x\)-vector component: expanding the definitions of \(\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}\), \(\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}\), and \(\operatorname {compose}\), and using the fact that filtering distributes over symmetric difference (\(\operatorname {filter}_p(S \mathbin {\triangle } T) = \operatorname {filter}_p(S) \mathbin {\triangle } \operatorname {filter}_p(T)\)), we apply the \(\mathbb {Z}_2\) sum additivity over symmetric differences with the function \(f \mapsto \text{if } f.\mathrm{qubit} = q \text{ then } f.\mathrm{xComponent} \text{ else } 0\). The \(z\)-vector component follows identically with \(\mathrm{zComponent}\) replacing \(\mathrm{xComponent}\).

Theorem 939 Composition Preserves Syndrome-Freeness

Composing two syndrome-free faults preserves syndrome-freeness. If both \(F\) and \(S\) are syndrome-free in the gauging procedure, then \(F \cdot S\) is also syndrome-free.

Proof

Let \(\mathrm{idx}\) be an arbitrary detector index. We need to show that the detector is not violated by \((F \cdot S).\mathrm{timeFaults} = F.\mathrm{timeFaults} \mathbin {\triangle } S.\mathrm{timeFaults}\). By the characterization of violation via \(\operatorname {flipParity}\), we rewrite the goal using the \(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-additivity of \(\operatorname {flipParity}\) over symmetric differences. Since \(F\) is syndrome-free, \(\operatorname {flipParity}(D, F.\mathrm{timeFaults}) \neq 1\), and since every element of \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) that is not \(1\) equals \(0\), we get \(\operatorname {flipParity}(D, F.\mathrm{timeFaults}) = 0\). Similarly \(\operatorname {flipParity}(D, S.\mathrm{timeFaults}) = 0\). Therefore \(\operatorname {flipParity}(D, F.\mathrm{timeFaults} \mathbin {\triangle } S.\mathrm{timeFaults}) = 0 + 0 = 0 \neq 1\).

Theorem 940 Composition With Stabilizer Preserves Syndrome-Freeness

Composing a syndrome-free fault \(F\) with a full gauging stabilizer \(S\) preserves syndrome-freeness.

Proof

This follows directly from the fact that composing two syndrome-free faults preserves syndrome-freeness, since a full gauging stabilizer is in particular syndrome-free.

Theorem 941 Composition of Full Gauging Stabilizers

The composition of two full gauging stabilizers is a full gauging stabilizer. Syndrome-freeness and outcome preservation are both additive over \(\mathbb {Z}_2\).

Proof

We verify each condition:

  1. Syndrome-free: This follows from \(\operatorname {compose\_ preserves\_ syndromeFree}\), since \(F_1\) is syndrome-free and \(F_2\) is a full gauging stabilizer.

  2. Preserves sign: By \(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-additivity, \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_1 \cdot F_2) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_1) + \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_2) = 0 + 0 = 0\).

  3. Pauli in stabilizer group: By multiplicativity of \(\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}\), the Pauli error of the composition is the product of two stabilizer group elements, which is in the stabilizer group by closure under multiplication.

Theorem 942 Empty Fault is a Full Gauging Stabilizer

The empty spacetime fault (no space-faults, no time-faults) is a full gauging stabilizer.

Proof

We verify each condition:

  1. Syndrome-free: With no time-faults, no detector can be violated, so this follows from the fact that a detector with an empty fault set is not violated.

  2. Preserves sign: With no time-faults, the \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}\) reduces to a sum over the empty set, which is \(0\).

  3. Pauli error is \(\mathbf{1}\): The Pauli error at any time of the empty fault is the identity \(1\), which is in the stabilizer group.

Theorem 943 Boundary Faults Trivially Absorbed

If a syndrome-free fault \(F'\) already has its space-faults concentrated at time \(t_i\) (i.e., \(F'.\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = \emptyset \) for all \(t \neq t_i\)), then there exists a full gauging stabilizer \(S_2\) such that \((F' \cdot S_2).\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = \emptyset \) for all \(t \neq t_i\). In fact, the empty fault serves as such a stabilizer.

Proof

We take \(S_2 = \operatorname {empty}\), the empty spacetime fault. By the previous theorem, \(\operatorname {empty}\) is a full gauging stabilizer. For the concentration property, let \(t \neq t_i\). Then \((F' \cdot \operatorname {empty}).\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = F'.\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = \emptyset \) by the hypothesis, using the fact that composing with the empty fault on the right is the identity.

Theorem 944 Space-Fault Cleaning with Full Stabilizer

Any syndrome-free spacetime fault \(F\) can be composed with a full gauging stabilizer \(S_1\) to concentrate all space-faults at \(t_i\). That is, there exists \(S_1\) with \(\operatorname {IsFullGaugingStabilizer}(\mathrm{proc}, S_1)\) such that for all \(t \neq \mathrm{proc}.\mathrm{phase2Start}\), \((F \cdot S_1).\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = \emptyset \). This uses the time-propagating and boundary generators from Lem 5.

Proof

From the \(\operatorname {space\_ fault\_ cleaning}\) axiom (Lem 5), applied to \(F\) and the syndrome-freeness hypothesis, we obtain \(S_1\) together with witnesses that \(S_1\) is syndrome-free, preserves the gauging sign, has its Pauli error in the stabilizer group, and cleans the space-faults. Packaging the first three properties gives \(\operatorname {IsFullGaugingStabilizer}(\mathrm{proc}, S_1)\), and the fourth gives the concentration property.

Theorem 945 Centralizer Membership of Cleaned Pure-Space Fault

A syndrome-free pure-space fault concentrated at \(t_i\) has its Pauli error in the centralizer of the deformed code. Formally, if \(F\) is syndrome-free, \(F.\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = \emptyset \) for all \(t \neq t_i\), and \(F\) is pure-space, then \(\operatorname {inCentralizer}(\text{deformedCode}, F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i))\).

Proof

This follows directly from the \(\operatorname {syndromeFree\_ pureSpace\_ inCentralizer}\) result from Lem 5, which encodes the quantum-mechanical fact that the deformed code checks are the active checks at \(t_i\) and the cleaning process preserves commutation.

The cleaned time-faults of a syndrome-free pure-time fault \(F_T\) either flip the gauging sign (i.e., \(F_T\) is a time-only logical fault corresponding to an \(A_v\) measurement string) or decompose into stabilizer generators (i.e., \(F_T\) is a gauging stabilizer).

Proof

By \(\operatorname {pureTime\_ syndromeFree\_ logical\_ or\_ stabilizer\_ generators}\) from Lem 6, applied to \(F_T\), \(\mathrm{hpure}\), and \(\mathrm{hfree}\), we obtain a disjunction. In the first case, \(F_T\) flips the gauging sign directly. In the second case, we extract that \(F_T\) preserves the sign and combine with syndrome-freeness to form the gauging stabilizer witness.

Theorem 947 gaussSignFlip Depends Only on Time-Faults

The gauging sign depends only on time-faults (measurement errors on Gauss checks). If two spacetime faults \(F_1\) and \(F_2\) have equal time-faults (\(F_1.\mathrm{timeFaults} = F_2.\mathrm{timeFaults}\)), then \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_1) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_2)\).

Proof

Expanding the definition of \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}\) as a double sum over vertices \(v\) and rounds \(r\), the result follows by congruence: for each \(v\) and \(r\), the summand depends only on \(F.\mathrm{timeFaults}\), which is equal for \(F_1\) and \(F_2\) by hypothesis.

Theorem 948 Pure-Space Fault Preserves Gauging Sign

A pure-space fault preserves the gauging sign: if \(F\) has no time-faults (\(F.\mathrm{timeFaults} = \emptyset \)), then \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F) = 0\).

Proof

Unfolding \(\operatorname {PreservesGaugingSign}\) and \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}\), and using \(F.\mathrm{isPureSpace}\) to replace \(F.\mathrm{timeFaults}\) with \(\emptyset \), every indicator \(\mathbf{1}[f \in \emptyset ]\) evaluates to \(0\). The entire double sum therefore equals \(0\).

Theorem 949 Pauli Error Depends Only on Space-Faults

The Pauli error at any time \(t\) depends only on space-faults. If two spacetime faults \(F_1\) and \(F_2\) have equal space-faults (\(F_1.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = F_2.\mathrm{spaceFaults}\)), then \(F_1.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t) = F_2.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t)\) for all \(t\).

Proof

By extensionality, we verify both the \(x\)-vector and \(z\)-vector components. Each component of \(\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}\) is defined as a sum over \(\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t)\), which is a filter of \(\mathrm{spaceFaults}\). Since \(F_1.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = F_2.\mathrm{spaceFaults}\), simplification gives the result in both components.

Theorem 950 Pure-Time Fault Has Trivial Pauli Error

A pure-time fault does not change the Pauli error at any time: if \(F\) has no space-faults (\(F.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = \emptyset \)), then \(F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t) = 1\) for all \(t\).

Proof

Unfolding \(F.\mathrm{isPureTime}\) gives \(F.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = \emptyset \). For both the \(x\)-vector and \(z\)-vector components, \(\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t)\) is a filter of the empty set, hence empty, and the sum over the empty set is \(0\), which matches the identity Pauli operator’s components.

Theorem 951 Independence of Space and Time Effects

The space and time components of a fault affect different aspects of the procedure outcome independently:

  1. The gauging sign \(\sigma \) depends only on time-faults: \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F.\mathrm{timeComponent})\).

  2. The Pauli error on the code state depends only on space-faults: for all \(t\), \(F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t) = F.\mathrm{spaceComponent}.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t)\).

Proof

We prove both parts. For part (1), we apply \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip\_ depends\_ only\_ on\_ timeFaults}\), noting that \(F.\mathrm{timeComponent}.\mathrm{timeFaults} = F.\mathrm{timeFaults}\) by definition of the time component. For part (2), for each \(t\), we apply \(\operatorname {pauliErrorAt\_ depends\_ only\_ on\_ spaceFaults}\), noting that \(F.\mathrm{spaceComponent}.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = F.\mathrm{spaceFaults}\) by definition of the space component.

Theorem 952 gaussSignFlip of Composition With Pure-Space Fault

The sign flip of \(F_S \cdot F_T\) equals the sign flip of \(F_T\) when \(F_S\) is pure-space: \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_S \cdot F_T) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_T)\).

Proof

We apply \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip\_ depends\_ only\_ on\_ timeFaults}\). Since \(F_S\) is pure-space, \(F_S.\mathrm{timeFaults} = \emptyset \), so \((F_S \cdot F_T).\mathrm{timeFaults} = \emptyset \mathbin {\triangle } F_T.\mathrm{timeFaults} = F_T.\mathrm{timeFaults}\).

Any spacetime logical fault \(F\) in the fault-tolerant gauging measurement procedure is equivalent, up to multiplication by spacetime stabilizers, to the product of a space-only fault \(F_S\) and a time-only fault \(F_T\).

Specifically: there exist \(F_S\), \(F_T\), and \(S\) such that:

  • \(F = (F_S \cdot F_T) \cdot S\) (composition via symmetric difference),

  • \(F_S\) is pure-space (no time-faults) and concentrated at time \(t_i\),

  • \(F_T\) is pure-time (no space-faults) and syndrome-free,

  • \(S\) is a full gauging stabilizer (syndrome-free, outcome-preserving),

  • At least one of \(F_S\), \(F_T\) is nontrivial: either \(\operatorname {FlipsGaugingSign}(\mathrm{proc}, F_T)\) or \(\operatorname {isLogicalOp}(\text{deformedCode}, F_S.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i))\).

Proof

Step 1: Clean space-faults to \(t_i\) using time-propagating stabilizers (Lem 5). By \(\operatorname {space\_ fault\_ cleaning\_ fullStabilizer}\), applied to \(F\) and its syndrome-freeness, we obtain a stabilizer \(S_1\) with \(\operatorname {IsFullGaugingStabilizer}(\mathrm{proc}, S_1)\) and the property that for all \(t \neq t_i\), \((F \cdot S_1).\operatorname {spaceFaultsAt}(t) = \emptyset \). Set \(F' := F \cdot S_1\). Then \(F'\) is syndrome-free by \(\operatorname {compose\_ preserves\_ syndromeFree}\).

Step 2: Absorb boundary faults. By \(\operatorname {boundary\_ faults\_ trivially\_ absorbed}\),applied to \(F'\), we obtain \(S_2\) with \(\operatorname {IsFullGaugingStabilizer}(\mathrm{proc}, S_2)\) such that \(F'' := F' \cdot S_2\) has space-faults concentrated at \(t_i\). Again \(F''\) is syndrome-free.

Step 3: Decompose \(F''\) into space and time components. Let \(F_S := F''.\mathrm{spaceComponent}\), \(F_T := F''.\mathrm{timeComponent}\), and \(S := S_1 \cdot S_2\). Then \(S\) is a full gauging stabilizer by \(\operatorname {compose\_ fullGaugingStabilizer}\).

We now verify each claimed property:

  • \(F = (F_S \cdot F_T) \cdot S\): By the space-time decomposition \(F'' = F_S \cdot F_T\), and \(F'' = F \cdot S_1 \cdot S_2 = F \cdot S\). So \(F = F'' \cdot S\) (since composition is involutive: \(F \cdot S \cdot S = F\)), hence \(F = (F_S \cdot F_T) \cdot S\) by associativity and self-cancellation.

  • \(F_S\) is pure-space: By \(F''.\operatorname {spaceComponent\_ isPureSpace}\).

  • \(F_S\) concentrated at \(t_i\): The space-faults of \(F_S\) equal those of \(F''\) (by definition of spaceComponent), which are concentrated at \(t_i\).

  • \(F_T\) is pure-time: By \(F''.\operatorname {timeComponent\_ isPureTime}\).

  • \(F_T\) is syndrome-free: Since \(F_T.\mathrm{timeFaults} = F''.\mathrm{timeFaults}\), detector violations are the same, so syndrome-freeness of \(F''\) transfers.

  • \(S\) is a full gauging stabilizer: Already established.

  • Nontriviality: Since \(F\) is a logical fault, \(\neg \operatorname {FullOutcomePreserving}(\mathrm{proc}, F)\). By \(\operatorname {flipsOrPreserves}\), either \(F\) flips the sign or preserves it.

    If \(F\) flips the sign, then \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F_T) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F'') = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F') + \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, S_2) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F) + 0 + 0 = 1\) by \(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-additivity and the fact that \(S_1, S_2\) preserve the sign.

    If \(F\) preserves the sign, then since the outcome is not preserved, the Pauli error \(F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \notin \mathcal{S}\). We show \(F_S.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) = F''.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i)\) (same space-faults). By multiplicativity, \(F''.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) = F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \cdot (S_1.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \cdot S_2.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i))\), with \(S_1, S_2\) having Pauli errors in \(\mathcal{S}\). Since \(F_S\) is syndrome-free, concentrated at \(t_i\), and pure-space, it lies in the centralizer by \(\operatorname {centralizer\_ of\_ syndromeFree\_ pureSpace}\). Moreover, \(F_S.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \notin \mathcal{S}\) (otherwise \(F.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \in \mathcal{S}\) by group closure and the inverse, contradicting the hypothesis). Finally \(F_S.\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(t_i) \neq 1\) (otherwise it would be in \(\mathcal{S}\)). Combining centralizer membership, non-membership in \(\mathcal{S}\), and non-identity gives \(\operatorname {isLogicalOp}\).

Theorem 954 \(A_v\) String is Canonical Time Logical Fault

The \(A_v\) string is the canonical time-only logical fault. For any vertex \(v\) and odd \(d\), \(\operatorname {gaussStringFault}(\mathrm{proc}, v)\) satisfies \(\operatorname {IsTimeLogicalFault}(\mathrm{proc}, \cdot )\): it is pure-time, syndrome-free, and flips the gauging sign.

Proof

The three conditions are established directly:

  1. Pure-time: by \(\operatorname {gaussStringFault\_ isPureTime}\).

  2. Syndrome-free: by \(\operatorname {gaussStringFault\_ syndromeFree}\).

  3. Flips the gauging sign when \(d\) is odd: by \(\operatorname {gaussStringFault\_ flipsSign\_ of\_ odd}\).

Theorem 955 Time-Only Logical Faults Have Weight \(\geq d\)

Time-only logical faults have weight at least \(d\) (when \(d\) is odd). If \(F_T\) is a time logical fault and \(d\) is odd, then \(d \leq \operatorname {weight}(F_T)\).

Proof

This follows directly from \(\operatorname {pureTime\_ logicalFault\_ weight\_ ge\_ d}\) from Lem 6, applied to \(F_T\) with the pure-time, syndrome-free, and sign-flipping hypotheses extracted from \(\operatorname {IsTimeLogicalFault}\).

Theorem 956 \(A_v\) String Flips Sign

For any vertex \(v\) and odd \(d\), \(\operatorname {FlipsGaugingSign}(\mathrm{proc}, \operatorname {gaussStringFault}(\mathrm{proc}, v))\).

Proof

This follows directly from \(\operatorname {gaussStringFault\_ flipsSign\_ of\_ odd}\).

Theorem 957 gaussSignFlip of Pure-Space Fault is Zero

A pure-space fault has zero sign flip: \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(\mathrm{proc}, F) = 0\).

Proof

This follows directly from \(\operatorname {pureSpace\_ preservesSign}\).

Theorem 958 Fault Space-Time Decomposition

Any spacetime fault \(F\) decomposes into its space and time components: \(F = F.\mathrm{spaceComponent} \cdot F.\mathrm{timeComponent}\).

Proof

This is the symmetric form of \(\operatorname {SpacetimeFault.decompose\_ space\_ time}\).

Theorem 959 Weight Decomposition

The weight of a fault is the sum of its space and time weights: \(\operatorname {weight}(F) = \operatorname {spaceWeight}(F) + \operatorname {timeWeight}(F)\).

Proof

This follows directly from \(F.\operatorname {weight\_ eq\_ space\_ plus\_ time}\).

Theorem 960 Compose Pure-Space and Pure-Time Preserves Space Component

The composition of a pure-space fault \(F_S\) and a pure-time fault \(F_T\) preserves the space component: \((F_S \cdot F_T).\mathrm{spaceComponent} = F_S\).

Proof

Unfolding \(\mathrm{isPureSpace}\) and \(\mathrm{isPureTime}\) gives \(F_S.\mathrm{timeFaults} = \emptyset \) and \(F_T.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = \emptyset \). By extensionality, for the space-faults: \((F_S \cdot F_T).\mathrm{spaceComponent}.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = (F_S.\mathrm{spaceFaults} \mathbin {\triangle } \emptyset ) = F_S.\mathrm{spaceFaults}\). For the time-faults: the space component has time-faults from the symmetric difference of the original time-fault sets, but since \(F_S.\mathrm{timeFaults} = \emptyset \), the time-faults of the space component are empty.

Theorem 961 Compose Pure-Space and Pure-Time Preserves Time Component

The composition of a pure-space fault \(F_S\) and a pure-time fault \(F_T\) preserves the time component: \((F_S \cdot F_T).\mathrm{timeComponent} = F_T\).

Proof

Unfolding \(\mathrm{isPureSpace}\) and \(\mathrm{isPureTime}\) gives \(F_S.\mathrm{timeFaults} = \emptyset \) and \(F_T.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = \emptyset \). By extensionality, for the space-faults: the time component has space-faults from the composition, but since \(F_T.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = \emptyset \), the result is \(\emptyset \). For the time-faults: \((F_S \cdot F_T).\mathrm{timeComponent}.\mathrm{timeFaults} = (\emptyset \mathbin {\triangle } F_T.\mathrm{timeFaults}) = F_T.\mathrm{timeFaults}\).

Theorem 962 Weight Additivity for Pure-Space and Pure-Time Composition

When \(F_S\) is pure-space and \(F_T\) is pure-time, their composition has weight equal to the sum of their weights: \(\operatorname {weight}(F_S \cdot F_T) = \operatorname {weight}(F_S) + \operatorname {weight}(F_T)\). This holds because their fault sets are disjoint.

Proof

Expanding the definition of weight as \(|\mathrm{spaceFaults}| + |\mathrm{timeFaults}|\) and using \(F_S.\mathrm{timeFaults} = \emptyset \) and \(F_T.\mathrm{spaceFaults} = \emptyset \), the symmetric differences simplify: \(|F_S.\mathrm{spaceFaults} \mathbin {\triangle } \emptyset | + |\emptyset \mathbin {\triangle } F_T.\mathrm{timeFaults}| = |F_S.\mathrm{spaceFaults}| + |F_T.\mathrm{timeFaults}|\), using \(S \mathbin {\triangle } \bot = S\) and \(\bot \mathbin {\triangle } S = S\).

If \(F\) is a syndrome-free fault that flips the gauging sign and \(d\) is odd, then there exists a vertex \(v \in V\) such that for all rounds \(r \in \operatorname {Fin}(d)\), the time-fault corresponding to the Gauss law measurement of \(v\) at round \(r\) belongs to \(F.\mathrm{timeFaults}\). That is, \(F\) contains at least one full \(A_v\) measurement string.

Proof

By \(\operatorname {sign\_ flip\_ implies\_ odd\_ full\_ strings}\), the number of vertices \(v\) with \(\operatorname {gaussFaultCount}(\mathrm{proc}, v, F) = d\) is odd. In particular, the filter of such vertices is nonempty (an odd number cannot be zero). Let \(v\) be an element of this nonempty set, so \(\operatorname {gaussFaultCount}(\mathrm{proc}, v, F) = d\).

For an arbitrary round \(r\), we need to show the corresponding time-fault is in \(F.\mathrm{timeFaults}\). Consider round \(r_0 = 0\) (which exists since \(d {\gt} 0\) by oddness). By \(\operatorname {syndromeFree\_ gauss\_ all\_ or\_ none}\), for vertex \(v\), either all Gauss measurements at all rounds are in \(F.\mathrm{timeFaults}\), or none are. If the round-\(0\) measurement were absent, then by \(\operatorname {gaussFaultCount\_ zero\_ or\_ d}\), the count would be either \(0\) or \(d\). Since round \(0\) is absent, the count cannot be \(d\) (as the filter would have strictly fewer than \(|\operatorname {Fin}(d)|\) elements), so it would be \(0\), contradicting \(\operatorname {gaussFaultCount} = d {\gt} 0\). Therefore the round-\(0\) measurement is present, and by the all-or-none property, all rounds including \(r\) are present.

For any spacetime logical fault \(F\) of the fault-tolerant gauging measurement procedure:

  1. \(F\) decomposes as \(F = (F_S \cdot F_T) \cdot S\) where \(F_S\) is pure-space and concentrated at \(t_i\), \(F_T\) is pure-time and syndrome-free, and \(S\) is a full gauging stabilizer.

  2. The gauging sign \(\sigma \) is determined entirely by \(F_T\): \(\operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(F) = \operatorname {gaussSignFlip}(F.\mathrm{timeComponent})\).

  3. The Pauli error on the code state is determined entirely by \(F_S\): \(\operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(F, t) = \operatorname {pauliErrorAt}(F.\mathrm{spaceComponent}, t)\) for all \(t\).

Proof

We proveeach part separately.

  1. The decomposition is obtained from \(\operatorname {spaceTime\_ decomposition}\), extracting \(F_S\), \(F_T\), \(S\) and their properties (dropping the nontriviality clause which is not needed here).

  2. The sign independence follows from the first component of \(\operatorname {space\_ time\_ independent\_ effects}(\mathrm{proc}, F)\).

  3. The Pauli error independence follows from the second component of \(\operatorname {space\_ time\_ independent\_ effects}(\mathrm{proc}, F)\).

Theorem 965 Decoupling Weight Bound

For any pair of pure-space and pure-time faults, their composition has weight at most the sum of their weights: \(\operatorname {weight}(F_S \cdot F_T) \leq \operatorname {weight}(F_S) + \operatorname {weight}(F_T)\). In fact, equality holds.

Proof

By \(\operatorname {compose\_ pureSpace\_ pureTime\_ weight}\), \(\operatorname {weight}(F_S \cdot F_T) = \operatorname {weight}(F_S) + \operatorname {weight}(F_T)\), and rewriting gives the inequality (which is in fact an equality).

I’ll start by reading the Lean file to understand its contents.Now I have a thorough understanding of the file. Let me produce the LaTeX translation.